🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are increasingly allowing the far right to set the public discourse, according to a recent research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by validating their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The findings, released in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and migration, established parties increasingly adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This factor has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the study was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations across the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European news outlets," explained another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a former German chancellor advocated widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the UK to the French Republic embrace the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the radical right, even as research suggests that this approach drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered revealed that the influence of radical parties had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The study emphasized the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their own discourses, particularly on topics such as migration and integration, rather than constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one researcher. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be heard."